<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The b5media team is not the most tactful bunch&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:38:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abe</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Abe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-100</guid>
		<description>My apologies for the mistype and wrong grammar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies for the mistype and wrong grammar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abe</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Abe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I guess it&#039;s really hard to draw the line between:

a) you being a blogger and voicing out your personal &quot;opinions&quot; about certain blogs you own/run

b) you being the blog network owner which is always expected to promote and patronize ALL of your blogs whatever you personal feel about any one of them.

I guess what Robb was pointing out is that if it&#039;s a personal opinion and it alienates a blog you own or a blogger under you, then it is best kept private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it&#8217;s really hard to draw the line between:</p>
<p>a) you being a blogger and voicing out your personal &#8220;opinions&#8221; about certain blogs you own/run</p>
<p>b) you being the blog network owner which is always expected to promote and patronize ALL of your blogs whatever you personal feel about any one of them.</p>
<p>I guess what Robb was pointing out is that if it&#8217;s a personal opinion and it alienates a blog you own or a blogger under you, then it is best kept private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Evans (SYNTAGMA)</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>John Evans (SYNTAGMA)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-97</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s certainly true. The b5 setup is about as wide-ranging as you could get. That doesn&#039;t mean there isn&#039;t a place for the &quot;monoculture&quot; though. My own Syntagma Media tends to reflect my own tastes, ranging from Google and Microsoft to Spiritual Nirvana and Tertiary Blogging. The one thing it doesn&#039;t contain is anything divisive, like politics, although I&#039;m fascinated by aspects of politics. I nearly started a blog on David Cameron, the new Tory leader here in the UK, who&#039;s the hottest topic around now. But the &quot;divisive&quot; block stopped it. Vive le difference, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s certainly true. The b5 setup is about as wide-ranging as you could get. That doesn&#8217;t mean there isn&#8217;t a place for the &#8220;monoculture&#8221; though. My own Syntagma Media tends to reflect my own tastes, ranging from Google and Microsoft to Spiritual Nirvana and Tertiary Blogging. The one thing it doesn&#8217;t contain is anything divisive, like politics, although I&#8217;m fascinated by aspects of politics. I nearly started a blog on David Cameron, the new Tory leader here in the UK, who&#8217;s the hottest topic around now. But the &#8220;divisive&#8221; block stopped it. Vive le difference, I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 03:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-95</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also note on the money side that we are a partnership of 4 people with totally varied tastes and interests, and I would suggest that this is one of our biggest strengths as well, we are not a monocultural blogging network but a broadchurch targeting the long tail of the blogosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also note on the money side that we are a partnership of 4 people with totally varied tastes and interests, and I would suggest that this is one of our biggest strengths as well, we are not a monocultural blogging network but a broadchurch targeting the long tail of the blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 02:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Darren&#039;s hit it on the head, if it reflected my tastes we&#039;d be losing money hand over fist :-)

The point I was trying to make is that when people criticise some of our sites they are doing so from their own personal perspectives and likes, and in particular I can remember a few people picking out the entertainment channel blogs. Now I&#039;m TOTALLY not into the whole celebrity scene thing, so the content is boring to me personally, but to people who are interested in this stuff its bloody brilliant. I also acknowledged that the writing style of those writing the blogs were first rate, even if I wasn&#039;t personally interested in the content, as others have obviously said they aren&#039;t, but in a way that totally puts these blogs down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren&#8217;s hit it on the head, if it reflected my tastes we&#8217;d be losing money hand over fist <img src='http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The point I was trying to make is that when people criticise some of our sites they are doing so from their own personal perspectives and likes, and in particular I can remember a few people picking out the entertainment channel blogs. Now I&#8217;m TOTALLY not into the whole celebrity scene thing, so the content is boring to me personally, but to people who are interested in this stuff its bloody brilliant. I also acknowledged that the writing style of those writing the blogs were first rate, even if I wasn&#8217;t personally interested in the content, as others have obviously said they aren&#8217;t, but in a way that totally puts these blogs down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-92</guid>
		<description>If we only had blogs on topics Duncan enjoyed we&#039;d end up with a very wierd mix of blogs. You should see his CD collection and hear what he watching on TV!

Point is - we&#039;re trying to develop a network of blogs that has individual blogs that appeal to all kinds of tastes and people - even people like Duncan! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we only had blogs on topics Duncan enjoyed we&#8217;d end up with a very wierd mix of blogs. You should see his CD collection and hear what he watching on TV!</p>
<p>Point is &#8211; we&#8217;re trying to develop a network of blogs that has individual blogs that appeal to all kinds of tastes and people &#8211; even people like Duncan! <img src='http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abe</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Abe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-91</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s more like the President  saying he doesn&#039;t like some of his Cabinet members? The President should fire &#039;em and get new ones he likes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more like the President  saying he doesn&#8217;t like some of his Cabinet members? The President should fire &#8216;em and get new ones he likes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kukral</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kukral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Hey, shouldn&#039;t ReveNews be on that list on the right of this page? Corante is on there. So should we!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, shouldn&#8217;t ReveNews be on that list on the right of this page? Corante is on there. So should we!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Dunewood</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Dunewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-89</guid>
		<description>John,

I agree that there are excellent blogs out their that I would find boring, as well as blogs that I love that others would find boring.  All that I am saying that it is probably not in your best interest as a blog network owner to call your own blogs and bloggers &lt;b&gt;totally boring&lt;/b&gt;.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, Duncan is totally entitled with his opinion and I am not faulting him for that.  I am just saying the in a position of blog network owner, one needs to be a bit more tactful with the message that they convey.  He could have said something like &quot;we have a large network with dozens of blogs and I definately have my favorites but the purpose of the network is to reach a broader audience.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>I agree that there are excellent blogs out their that I would find boring, as well as blogs that I love that others would find boring.  All that I am saying that it is probably not in your best interest as a blog network owner to call your own blogs and bloggers <b>totally boring</b>.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Duncan is totally entitled with his opinion and I am not faulting him for that.  I am just saying the in a position of blog network owner, one needs to be a bit more tactful with the message that they convey.  He could have said something like &#8220;we have a large network with dozens of blogs and I definately have my favorites but the purpose of the network is to reach a broader audience.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Grote</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/2005/12/07/the-b5media-team-is-not-the-most-tactful-bunch/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Grote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 17:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blognetworkwatch.net/?p=45#comment-88</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the long tail, baby!

Focus on an area and give people who are interested in it what they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the long tail, baby!</p>
<p>Focus on an area and give people who are interested in it what they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
